BMC Health Services Research · 2015 · 10 citations · 23 references
PharmacyOncologyPharmacoeconomicsChemotherapyCost-effectiveness AnalysisCost-utility AnalysisComparative Effectiveness ModelingCost-effectiveness ComparisonCost-effectiveness ModelingMetastatic Breast CancerModel-based Economic EvaluationPharmacoeconomic EvaluationAromatase InhibitorsBreast Cancer ChemotherapyCost-effectivenessHormone Receptor - Positive Breast CancerHormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer TherapyMetastatic Breast Cancer TreatmentQuality-adjusted SurvivalSecond-line Chemotherapy
BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness (CE) study of combined everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE) versus the common clinical practice in Greece for the treatment of postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (BC) progressing on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI). The combinations of bevacizumab (BEV) plus paclitaxel (PACL) and BEV plus capecitabine (CAPE) were selected as comparators. METHOD: A Markov model, consisting of three health states, was used to describe disease progression and evaluate the CE of the comparators from a third-party payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Efficacy and safety data as well as utility values considered in the model were extracted from the relevant randomized Phase III clinical trials and other published studies. Direct medical costs referring to the year 2014 were incorporated in the model. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for uncertainty and variation in the parameters of the model. Primary outcomes were patient survival (life-years), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total direct costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). RESULTS: The discounted quality-adjusted survival of patients treated with EVE plus EXE was greater by 0.035 and 0.004 QALYs, compared to BEV plus PACL and BEV plus CAPE, respectively. EVE plus EXE was the least costly treatment in terms of drug acquisition, administration, and concomitant medications. The total lifetime cost per patient was estimated at €55,022, €67,980, and €62,822 for EVE plus EXE, BEV plus PACL, and BEV plus CAPE, respectively. The probabilistic analysis confirmed the deterministic results. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that EVE plus EXE may be a dominant alternative relative to BEV plus PACL and BEV plus CAPE for the treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced BC patients failing initial therapy with NSAIs.
23
Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008
Jacques Ferlay, Hai‐Rim Shin, Freddie Bray et al. · International Journal of Cancer · 2010 · 21.4K citations
Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab versus Paclitaxel Alone for Metastatic Breast Cancer
Kathy D. Miller, Molin Wang, Julie R. Gralow et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2007 · 3.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +13
Everolimus in Postmenopausal Hormone-Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
José Baselga, Mario Campone, Martine Piccart et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 2.8K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +9
Metastatic Behavior of Breast Cancer Subtypes
Hagen F. Kennecke, Rinat Yerushalmi, Ryan Woods et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2010 · 2.3K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cancer Biology, Oncology +14
Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008
Freddie Bray, Jiansong Ren, E. Masuyer et al. · International Journal of Cancer · 2012 · 1.9K citations · Full text