Publication | Closed Access
Bullying: Are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing?
400
Citations
41
References
2008
Year
Same ThingEducationVictimisationPsychologyChild DisciplineSocial-emotional DevelopmentChild PsychologyBehavioral SciencesPower ImbalanceSocial SkillsSchool PsychologyBullyingAdolescent PsychologyAdolescent DevelopmentAdolescent LearningCyberbullyingExperience ItemsBullying PreventionSchool ViolenceOnline HarassmentChild DevelopmentPsychological ViolenceStandard Bullying DefinitionArtsAggression
The growing body of bullying research necessitates clarity on what is actually being studied. The study examined whether children’s own definitions of bullying align with researcher‑defined criteria and whether providing a definition changes reported victimization and bullying rates. Participants (N = 1,767, ages 8–18) were randomly assigned to receive either a standard bullying definition or to generate their own definition before reporting experiences. Children’s definitions seldom included intentionality, repetition, or power imbalance (1.7 %, 6 %, 26 % respectively) but 92 % mentioned negative behaviors, younger children emphasized physical and verbal aggression, middle‑aged children relational aggression (especially girls), and giving a definition reduced reported victimization but increased reported bullying among boys.
Given the rapid increase in studies of bullying and peer harassment among youth, it becomes important to understand just what is being researched. This study explored whether the themes that emerged from children's definitions of bullying were consistent with theoretical and methodological operationalizations within the research literature, and whether the provision of a definition when administering bullying experience items would lead to different prevalence rates in reported victimization and bullying. Students aged 8—18 ( N = 1767) were randomly assigned to one of two conditions. In the first condition, students were provided with a standard bullying definition; in the second condition, students provided their own definition of bullying. Results indicated that students' definitions of bullying rarely included the three prominent definitional criteria typically endorsed by researchers: intentionality (1.7%), repetition (6%), and power imbalance (26%), although almost all students (92%) did emphasize negative behaviors in their definition. Younger children made more mention of physical aggression, general harassing behaviors, and verbal aggression in their definitions, whereas the theme of relational aggression was most prominent in the middle years and reported more by girls than boys. Finally, students who were given a definition of bullying reported being victimized less than students not provided with a definition. As well, boys who were given a definition of bullying tended to report higher levels of bullying than those not given a definition (marginal effect).
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1