Publication | Open Access
Irrigation in the Texas High Plains: a brief history and potential reductions in demand
241
Citations
27
References
2008
Year
EngineeringPotential ReductionsAgricultural EconomicsLand ApplicationLand DegradationIrrigation ManagementWater AvailabilityAgricultural Water ManagementIrrigation EngineeringSustainable AgricultureTexas High PlainsPublic HealthWater ConservationGeographyCrop Water RelationIrrigationAbstract IrrigationAgricultural HistoryWater PricingHydrologySustainable Groundwater ManagementWater ResourcesDroughtAgricultural ModelingTxhpet NetworkBrief HistoryGroundwater ManagementIrrigation Development
Irrigation in the semi‑arid Texas High Plains relies on groundwater from the Ogallala Aquifer, which is declining because withdrawals exceed natural recharge, and the sector expanded rapidly in the 1950s, peaked in 1974, declined through 1989, and by 2004 had returned to 1958 levels of area with a slight rise in pumped volume. The authors reviewed several groundwater‑saving strategies that preserve irrigated acreage and crop yields, finding that weather‑based scheduling via the TXHPET network, conversion of gravity‑irrigated fields to center‑pivot systems, and replacing high‑water‑use corn with lower‑water cotton were the most promising. Doubling the area using the TXHPET network and reducing gravity‑irrigated land to 10% could cut groundwater withdrawals by 14%, while converting half of the irrigated corn area to cotton could yield an additional 8% reduction. © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Abstract Irrigation for crop production in the semi‐arid Texas High Plains is dependent on groundwater withdrawals from the Ogallala Aquifer, which is declining because withdrawals exceed natural recharge. Irrigation development in the region accelerated during the 1950s. Both irrigated area and volume pumped peaked in 1974 and steadily declined during 1974–1989. By 2004, however, irrigated area was nearly the same as it was in 1958, and volume pumped had increased slightly. Several strategies to reduce groundwater withdrawals were reviewed without any reductions in irrigated land area or crop productivity. The most promising evaluated were: (1) increasing weather‐based irrigation scheduling using the Texas High Plains Evapotranspiration Network (TXHPET); (2) converting gravity‐irrigated land (27% of total) to centre pivot irrigation; and (3) replacing high‐water to lower‐water demand crops (i.e., corn to cotton). If the land area using the TXHPET network was doubled, and if gravity‐irrigated lands were reduced to 10%, groundwater withdrawals could be reduced by 14%. An additional reduction of 8% may be possible by converting half of the irrigated corn area to cotton. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1