BMJ Quality & Safety · 2014 · 663 citations · 25 references
Public HealthOncologyClinical EpidemiologyEpidemiologic MethodsEpidemiologyDiagnostic ErrorDiagnostic Error DetectionMedical Chart ReviewMisdiagnosis DetectionMissed Diagnosis DetectionOutpatient Chart ReviewPrimary Care Diagnostic ErrorsPrimary Care Visit PatternsReturn Visits
Outpatient diagnostic error rates are difficult to estimate because of inconsistent definitions and the need to review data across multiple providers and settings. The study estimated the frequency of outpatient diagnostic errors in the US adult population by synthesizing data from three clinic-based studies with similar error definitions. The authors combined three clinic-based studies—two using electronic triggers to detect abnormal return visits or missed follow-up for colorectal cancer and one examining consecutive lung cancer cases—confirmed errors by chart review, and extrapolated the resulting rates to the US adult population. Combining the estimates yielded a 5.08% outpatient diagnostic error rate (about 12 million US adults per year), roughly half of which could be harmful, indicating that at least one in twenty adults experience such errors.
Background The frequency of outpatient diagnostic errors is challenging to determine due to varying error definitions and the need to review data across multiple providers and care settings over time. We estimated the frequency of diagnostic errors in the US adult population by synthesising data from three previous studies of clinic-based populations that used conceptually similar definitions of diagnostic error. Methods Data sources included two previous studies that used electronic triggers, or algorithms, to detect unusual patterns of return visits after an initial primary care visit or lack of follow-up of abnormal clinical findings related to colorectal cancer, both suggestive of diagnostic errors. A third study examined consecutive cases of lung cancer. In all three studies, diagnostic errors were confirmed through chart review and defined as missed opportunities to make a timely or correct diagnosis based on available evidence. We extrapolated the frequency of diagnostic error obtained from our studies to the US adult population, using the primary care study to estimate rates of diagnostic error for acute conditions (and exacerbations of existing conditions) and the two cancer studies to conservatively estimate rates of missed diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancer (as proxies for other serious chronic conditions). Results Combining estimates from the three studies yielded a rate of outpatient diagnostic errors of 5.08%, or approximately 12 million US adults every year. Based upon previous work, we estimate that about half of these errors could potentially be harmful. Conclusions Our population-based estimate suggests that diagnostic errors affect at least 1 in 20 US adults. This foundational evidence should encourage policymakers, healthcare organisations and researchers to start measuring and reducing diagnostic errors.
25
Incidence and Types of Adverse Events and Negligent Care in Utah and Colorado
Eric J. Thomas, David M. Studdert, Helen Burstin et al. · Medical Care · 2000 · 1.7K citations
Gordon D. Schiff · Archives of Internal Medicine · 2009 · 635 citations
Law, Internal Medicine, Epidemiology +11
The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine
Mark L. Graber · BMJ Quality & Safety · 2013 · 631 citations · Full text