Current Directions in Psychological Science · 2010 · 361 citations · 15 references
Social SciencesPsychologySocial PsychologyMoral PsychologySocial CognitionSocial InfluenceHuman AgencySocial ReasoningSupernatural BeingsAgentic TraitsAnthropomorphismHuman-nonhuman RelationsSelfish Gene Theory
Anthropomorphism—attributing human traits to gods, computers, and genes—is pervasive across religion, marketing, and science, shaping judgments of agency, accountability, and moral concern. The study seeks to identify the factors that drive people to anthropomorphize nonhuman agents, thereby illuminating the reverse process of dehumanization and extending social cognition theory to diverse agents. Three key factors—elicited agent knowledge, sociality motivation, and effectance motivation—explain much of the variation in anthropomorphism.
People conceive of wrathful gods, fickle computers, and selfish genes, attributing human characteristics to a variety of supernatural, technological, and biological agents. This tendency to anthropomorphize nonhuman agents figures prominently in domains ranging from religion to marketing to computer science. Perceiving an agent to be humanlike has important implications for whether the agent is capable of social influence, accountable for its actions, and worthy of moral care and consideration. Three primary factors-elicited agent knowledge, sociality motivation, and effectance motivation-appear to account for a significant amount of variability in anthropomorphism. Identifying these factors that lead people to see nonhuman agents as humanlike also sheds light on the inverse process of dehumanization, whereby people treat human agents as animals or objects. Understanding anthropomorphism can contribute to a more expansive view of social cognition that applies social psychological theory to a wide variety of both human and nonhuman agents.
15
Heather M. Gray, Kurt Gray, Daniel M. Wegner · Science · 2007 · 2.2K citations
Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low
Lasana T. Harris, Susan T. Fiske · Psychological Science · 2006 · 976 citations