Publication | Open Access
ASSESSMENT OF L-BAND SAR DATA AT DIFFERENT POLARIZATION COMBINATIONS FOR CROP AND OTHER LANDUSE CLASSIFICATION
50
Citations
18
References
2011
Year
Precision AgricultureEnvironmental MonitoringEngineeringLand UseLand CoverInterferometric Synthetic Aperture RadarEarth ScienceSocial SciencesCalibrationImaging RadarRadar Signal ProcessingSatellite ImagingSynthetic Aperture RadarMicrowave Remote SensingGeographyRadar ApplicationRadiometryTransmitter PolarizationSar DataLand Cover MapRadar ImagingRadarRadar ScatteringRemote SensingRadar Image ProcessingDifierent Polarization Combinations
In the present study evaluation of L-band SAR data at difierent polarization combinations in linear, circular as well as hybrid polarimetric imaging modes for crop and other landuse classiflcations has been carried out. Full-polarimetric radar data contains all the scattering information for any arbitrary polarization state, hence data of any combination of transmit and receive polarizations can be synthesized, mathematically from full-polarimetric data. Circular and various modes of hybrid polarimetric data (where the transmitter polarization is either circular or orientated at 45 - , called …=4 and the receivers are at horizontal and vertical polarizations with respect to the radar line of sight) were synthesized (simulated) from ALOS- PALSAR fullpolarimetric data of 14th December 2008 over central state farm central latitude and longitude 29 - 15 0 N/75 - 43 0 E and bounds for northwest corner is 29 - 24 0 N/75 - 37 0 E and southeast corner is 29 - 07 0 N/75 - 48 0 E in Hisar, Haryana (India) Supervised classiflcation was conducted for crops and few other landuse classes based on ground truth measurements using maximum-likelihood distance measures derived from the complex Wishart distribution of SAR data at various polarization combinations. It has been observed that linear full- polarimetric data showed maximum classiflcation accuracy (92%) followed by circular-full (89%) and circular-dual polarimetric data (87%), which was followed by hybrid polarimetric data (73{75%) and then linear dual polarimetric data (63{71%). Among the linear dual polarimetric data, co-polarization complex data showed better
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1