Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · 2003 · 222 citations · 45 references
EducationPsychologyMeasurement InvariancePsychometricsScale DevelopmentConfigural InvarianceCross-cultural InvarianceMeasurement EquivalencePsychological TestingStructural Equation ModelingTest ReliabilityCross-cultural Measurement EquivalenceCross-cultural Scale EquivalenceCross-cultural Scale ValidationCross-group Measurement EquivalenceMeasurement Equivalence TestingMulti-group Measurement ModelsSchwartz's Value TheoryStructural Equivalence
Equivalence of measurement across cultures is a prerequisite for the generalization of an instrument. The measurement equivalence of 10 value types derived from Schwartz's structural model of values and measured with the Schwartz Value Survey questionnaire is evaluated in 21 countries. Based on previous research by Schwartz and colleagues, the measurement equivalence of the 10 value types is tested separately using nested multigroup confirmatory factor analyses. Results indicate that it is possible for most value types to reach acceptable levels of configural and metric equivalence; only the dimension of Hedonism is rejected at these two levels of equivalence. Four value types (Benevolence, Conformity, Self-Direction, and Universalism) also show factor variance equivalence. The hypotheses of scalar and reliability equivalence are rejected for all value types. Indications are also given of the number of items to be included for measuring the value types at the different levels of equivalence.
45
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Michael W. Browne, Robert Cudeck · Sociological Methods & Research · 1992 · 25.2K citations
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Peter M. Bentler · Psychological Bulletin · 1990 · 23.9K citations