Publication | Open Access
Single-Trial Normalization for Event-Related Spectral Decomposition Reduces Sensitivity to Noisy Trials
364
Citations
36
References
2011
Year
Source SeparationNeuropsychologyNeurolinguisticsComplex Brain DynamicsAttentionTrial NormalizationElectroencephalographySocial SciencesStatistical Signal ProcessingBiostatisticsNeurologySingle-trial Correction MethodsCognitive NeuroscienceStatisticsData NormalizationNeuroimagingNoisy TrialsBrain ImagingFunctional Data AnalysisSignal ProcessingNeurophysiologyEeg Signal ProcessingBaseline CorrectionSpectral AnalysisStatistical InferenceNeuroscienceMedicineSignal SeparationSingle-trial Normalization
In electroencephalography, the classical event-related potential model often proves to be a limited method to study complex brain dynamics. For this reason, spectral techniques adapted from signal processing such as event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) - and its variant event-related synchronization and event-related desynchronization - have been used over the past 20 years. They represent average spectral changes in response to a stimulus. These spectral methods do not have strong consensus for comparing pre- and post-stimulus activity. When computing ERSP, pre-stimulus baseline removal is usually performed after averaging the spectral estimate of multiple trials. Correcting the baseline of each single-trial prior to averaging spectral estimates is an alternative baseline correction method. However, we show that this method leads to positively skewed post-stimulus ERSP values. We eventually present new single-trial-based ERSP baseline correction methods that perform trial normalization or centering prior to applying classical baseline correction methods. We show that single-trial correction methods minimize the contribution of artifactual data trials with high-amplitude spectral estimates and are robust to outliers when performing statistical inference testing. We then characterize these methods in terms of their time-frequency responses and behavior compared to classical ERSP methods.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1