Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 1992 · 113 citations · 20 references
MedicineBioengineeringRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyCardiovascular ImagingMagnetic Resonance Contrast MechanismsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical ImagingVascular ImagingFlow Dynamics ImagingFlow-related Signal ContrastMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance Flow ImagingStenosis HemodynamicsVascular Flow Imaging
Mechanisms of signal loss in magnetic resonance angiography were studied with a stenotic flow phantom. The results indicate that while signal loss induced by mean fluid motions is localized about the stenosis, the fluctuating component of fluid motion induces signal loss over a much larger region, primarily distal to the stenosis. For both motion components, use of gradient moment nulling (GMN) above first order was found to be an ineffective means of reducing signal loss. In contrast, shortened gradient durations were found to reduce signal loss substantially. However, though a zeroth-order gradient is generally of the shortest duration, use of a slightly longer, first-order gradient was found to be the most robust means of reducing signal loss.
20
Three‐dimensional phase contrast angiography
Charles L. Dumoulin, S. P. Souza, Madison Walker et al. · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 1989 · 432 citations
Medicine, Bioengineering, Radiology +17
MR image artifacts from periodic motion
Michael L. Wood, R. Mark Henkelman · Medical Physics · 1985 · 306 citations
Motion Artifact Suppression Technique (MAST) for MR Imaging
Pradip M. Pattany, Jeffrey J. Phillips, Lee C. Chiu et al. · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · 1987 · 217 citations