Conceptual and perceptual factors in the picture superiority effect

Abstract

The picture superiority effect, i.e., better memory for pictures than for corresponding words, has been variously ascribed to a conceptual or a perceptual processing advantage. The present study aimed to disentangle perceptual and conceptual contributions. Pictures and words were tested for recognition in both their original formats and translated into participants’ second language. Multinomial Processing Tree (Batchelder & Riefer, 1999 Batchelder, W. H. and Riefer, D. M. 1999. Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6(1): 57–86. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and MINERVA (Hintzman, 1984 Hintzman, D. L. 1984. MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 16(2): 96–101. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) models were fitted to the data, and parameters corresponding to perceptual and conceptual recognition were estimated. Over three experiments, orienting tasks were varied, with neutral (Exp. 1), semantic (Exp. 2), and perceptual (Exp. 3) instructions, and the encoding manipulations were used to validate the parameters. Results indicate that there is picture superiority in both conceptual and perceptual memory, but conceptual processing makes a stronger contribution to the advantage of pictures over words in recognition.