Procedia CIRP · 2015 · 58 citations · 18 references
ManagementSustainability ManagementSystems EngineeringLife Cycle AssessmentSustainability ScienceSustainable DesignLife-cycle CostingLifecycle AssessmentProduct-service SystemsSustainability AssessmentSustainable Business ModelsSustainable Product DesignEnvironmental Impact MitigationEnvironmental Sustainability AssessmentLife Cycle Sustainability AssessmentProduct Sustainability AssessmentProduct-service System SustainabilitySustainability In Product DesignSustainable Product-service Systems
Product‑service systems promise eco‑friendly solutions by integrating products and services, yet sustainability is not inherent, and existing assessment methods such as LCA and LCC are largely qualitative and lack evidence specific to PSS. The study aims to identify the issues that underpin the development of sustainable design methods for PSS and to highlight the need for operational tools that support companies and customers in PSS contracts. To address these gaps, the authors analyze literature on PSS assessment, comparing available methods and tools to emphasize similarities and differences and to propose operational approaches.
Product services systems (PSS) provide a promising opportunity for industries to propose both prosper and eco-friendly solutions to fulfill consumer needs. By shifting from traditional offer, comprised of physical products, to an integrated solution of product and services, it is assumed that PSS may reduce the environmental impact and provide benefits for the PSS provider and the consumer in economic and social ways. However, sustainability is not intrinsic characteristic of PSS. Operational methods and tools are needed to help companies develop such business models and supportcustomer choices relating to PSS contracts. Although there are already well established assessment methods in literature, such as Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing, there is still a lack of evidences from the particular field of PSS. Further on, most of existing methods and tools dealing with PSS assessment are based on qualitative parameters, which are subjective and hard to evaluate, anddo not provide detailed views of the results.This paper analyses this piece of literature (i.e. relating to PSS assessment) to emphasize similarities and differences between available methods and tools. The aim is to identify the issues underpinning the development of methods for sustainable design in the particular case of PSS.
18
Hans-Jürgen Klüppel · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · 2005 · 4.6K citations
Management, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Management +12
Reinout Heijungs, Gjalt Huppes, Jeroen B. Guinée · Polymer Degradation and Stability · 2009 · 340 citations
Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Sciences +17