Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2002 · 111 citations · 66 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsExtragalactic AstronomyObservational AstronomyDwarf GalaxiesExtragalactic AstrophysicsGalaxy ClustersBrightness ThresholdCluster Luminosity FunctionsLuminosity Function Of GalaxiesSystematic Error AnalysisSystematic Error CalibrationSystematic Error Correction
We measure the galaxy luminosity function (LF) for the Virgo Cluster between blue magnitudes M B 222 and 2 11 from wide-field charge-coupled device (CCD) imaging data. The LF is only gradually rising for 222 , M B , 216. Between M B 216 and 2 14 it rises steeply, with a logarithmic slope of a , 21:6. Fainter than M B 214, the LF flattens again. This LF is shallower (although turning up at brighter absolute magnitudes) than the R-band LF measured recently by Phillipps et al., who found a , 22:2 to be fainter than M R 213. It is similar, however, to the LF determined from the Virgo Cluster Catalog by Sandage et al. A few faint galaxies are found that Sandage et al. missed because their surface brightness threshold for detection was too high, but these do not dominate the luminosity function at any magnitude. Most of the faint galaxies we find are dwarf elliptical, alternatively called dwarf spheroidal, galaxies. The most important potential source of systematic error is that we may have rejected some high surface brightness galaxies from the cluster sample because we think that they are background galaxies. This is quite different from what has conventionally been regarded as the most serious source of systematic error in this kind of study: that we are missing many low surface brightness galaxies because they are never visible above the sky.
66
Dark Matter Substructure within Galactic Halos
Ben Moore, Sebastiano Ghigna, Fabio Governato et al. · The Astrophysical Journal · 1999 · 3K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +17