T<scp>AKING</scp>S<scp>TOCK</scp>: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics

TLDR

Constructivism analyzes how shared ideational factors, rather than material conditions, shape human interaction and actor interests, and its study has rapidly expanded in international relations and comparative politics. The essay assesses the empirical research program of constructivism across international relations and comparative politics. The authors first articulate constructivism’s core tenets and methodological implications, arguing that its distinctiveness stems from theory rather than empirical strategy, then survey key literature and debates in both fields.

Abstract

▪ Abstract Constructivism is an approach to social analysis that deals with the role of human consciousness in social life. It asserts that human interaction is shaped primarily by ideational factors, not simply material ones; that the most important ideational factors are widely shared or “intersubjective” beliefs, which are not reducible to individuals; and that these shared beliefs construct the interests of purposive actors. In international relations, research in a constructivist mode has exploded over the past decade, creating new and potentially fruitful connections with long-standing interest in these issues in comparative politics. In this essay, we evaluate the empirical research program of constructivism in these two fields. We first lay out the basic tenets of constructivism and examine their implications for research methodology, concluding that constructivism's distinctiveness lies in its theoretical arguments, not in its empirical research strategies. The bulk of the essay explores specific constructivist literatures and debates in international relations and comparative politics.