The <scp>E</scp>uropean <scp>C</scp>ommission and the <scp>E</scp>uropean <scp>D</scp>efence <scp>A</scp>gency: A Case of Rivalry?

Abstract

Abstract This article analyzes relations between the E uropean C ommission and the E uropean D efence A gency ( EDA ) as they relate to E uropean defence‐industrial co‐operation. To undertake the analysis, the article departs from a strictly intergovernmental‐supranational study of institutional relations by building upon the concept of ‘mandate overlap’. Additionally, the focus is on the constitutive policy approach of each institution. The EDA 's approach is characterized as ad hoc and project‐based in nature, and the E uropean C ommission's approach is structural and market‐based. Once the two approaches are delineated, the article then investigates whether either of the bodies has deviated from their respective mandates over a period beginning in 1996 and ending in 2013. On this basis, the conclusion is that there is evidence of rivalry between the two bodies, especially when E uropean U nion M ember S tates decide to use either entity to secure their interests.