Web Citation Availability: Analysis and Implications for Scholarship

Mary F. Casserly, James E. Bird

College & Research Libraries · 2003 · 84 citations · 29 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study presents eight suggestions to improve scholarly communication citation conventions. The authors profiled 500 Internet resource citations from 1999–2000 library and information science journal articles and searched them on the Web. Most citations lacked full bibliographic details and view dates, 81.4 % were available online, 89.2 % recoverable via the Internet Archive, and availability was linked to content type, domain, and directory depth, while few journals offered guidance on digital resource citation.

Abstract

Five hundred citations to Internet resources from articles published in library and information science journals in 1999 and 2000 were profiled and searched on the Web. The majority contained partial bibliographic information and no date viewed. Most URLs pointed to content pages with “edu” or “org” domains and did not include a tilde. More than half (56.4%) were permanent, 81.4 percent were available on the Web, and searching the Internet Archive increased the availability rate to 89.2 percent. Content, domain, and directory depth were associated with availability. Few of the journals provided instruction on citing digital resources. Eight suggestions for improving scholarly communication citation conventions are presented.

References

29