Organization Studies · 2012 · 481 citations · 68 references
EngineeringSustainability GovernanceSustainable DevelopmentInternational RegulationEnvironmental EconomicsSustainable Value CreationEnvironmental PolicyVoluntary StandardsGovernance (Urban Studies)ManagementEconomic SustainabilitySustainable SourcingGlobal StrategyGlobal GovernancePublic PolicyGovernance (Data Management)Global Coffee IndustryStandards MarketGlobalizationBusinessSustainability StandardsInternational OrganizationSustainabilitySustainable ProductionRegulationInternational Institutions
The proliferation of voluntary transnational standards creates a dilemma for standards organizations, as they claim shared goals yet promote increasingly similar, self‑interested standards. The paper introduces the concept of “standards markets” to analyze how social‑movement and industry‑driven standards bodies compete and collaborate in transnational governance. The authors employ a “standards markets” framework to examine the competitive and collaborative dynamics among social‑movement and industry‑driven standards organizations in transnational arenas. A case study of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry shows that coexistence of multiple standards is driven by convergence and differentiation mechanisms, creating a meta‑standardization market that allows rule‑level convergence while preserving attribute‑level differentiation and deepening insight into transnational governance.
The growing number of voluntary standards for governing transnational arenas is presenting standards organizations with a problem. While claiming that they are pursuing shared, overarching objectives, at the same time they are promoting their own respective standards that are increasingly similar. By developing the notion of ‘standards markets’, this paper examines this tension and studies how different social movement and industry-driven standards organizations compete as well as collaborate over governance in transnational arenas. Based on an in-depth case study of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry, we find that the ongoing co-existence of multiple standards is being promoted by the interplay between two countervailing mechanisms: convergence and differentiation. In conjunction, these mechanisms are enabling the emergence and persistence of a market for standards through what we describe as meta-standardization of sustainable practices. Meta-standardization leads to convergence at the ‘rules of the game’ level, but allows also differentiation at the attributes level, which is enabling parties to create and maintain their own standards. Our study helps to advance the understanding of transnational governance by explaining the dynamics of competing and collaborating non-state actors in constituting a standards market.
68
American Economic Review · 2013 · 15.2K citations
Clio and the economics of QWERTY
Paul A. David · American Economic Review · 1985 · 5.8K citations