Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · 2014 · 117 citations · 40 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious DiseasesVeterinary MicrobiologyDiagnostic MicrobiologyDiagnostic ParasitologyImmunology Of Infectious DiseasesAntigen Detection AssaysDiagnostic ImmunologyTick-borne DiseasesVeterinary ImmunologyAntibody Detection TestsAssayAssay SensitivityBorrelia Burgdorferi InfectionImmunodiagnostic AssaysTick-borne PathogensTick-borne ZoonosesVeterinary Diagnostics
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of an in-clinic ELISA designed for detection of heartworm antigen and antibodies against 5 tick-borne pathogens. DESIGN: Validation study. SAMPLE: 1,601 serum or matched serum, plasma, and blood samples from dogs. PROCEDURES: Samples were tested for Dirofilaria immitis (heartworm) antigen and antibodies against Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma platys, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and Ehrlichia ewingii by means of an in-clinic ELISA. Evaluation of assay sensitivity and specificity, agreement of results among sample types, and cross-reactivity of E canis antigens in the assay with anti-Ehrlichia chaffeensis antibodies in stored samples from experimentally infected dogs were performed at a reference laboratory. Field tests of the in-clinic ELISA were performed at 6 veterinary facilities. Results were compared with confirmatory test results. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of the in-clinic ELISA were > 89% for detection of antibodies against A phagocytophilum (93.2% and 99.2%, respectively), A platys (89.2% and 99.2%, respectively), B burgdorferi (96.7% and 98.8%, respectively), E canis (97.8% and 92.3%, respectively), and E ewingii (96.5% and 93.9%, respectively). Sensitivity of the assay for detection of D immitis was 98.9%, with 99.3% specificity. The in-clinic ELISA identified exposure to > 1 vector-borne pathogen in 354 of 1,195 samples. Cross-reactivity of E canis antigens with anti-E chaffeensis antibodies was confirmed. Results of field evaluations confirmed that the in-clinic ELISA could be reliably used under typical clinical conditions to identify dogs exposed to the pathogens of interest. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The in-clinic ELISA provided a comprehensive in-house serologic screening test for all vector-borne pathogens evaluated.
40
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
J. Richard Landis, Gary G. Koch · Biometrics · 1977 · 78.9K citations · Full text
Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat
CE Greene · Australian Veterinary Journal · 1999 · 2.6K citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Veterinary Parasitology +17
Summary of notifiable diseases--United States, 2002.
Samuel L. Groseclose, Patsy A Hall · PubMed · 2004 · 1.3K citations
Public Health, Infectious Diseases, Public Health Practice +14