Publication | Open Access
Sensitivity of PCR Targeting the IS <i>2404</i> Insertion Sequence of <i>Mycobacterium ulcerans</i> in an Assay Using Punch Biopsy Specimens for Diagnosis of Buruli Ulcer
91
Citations
18
References
2005
Year
Diagnostic MycologyPathogen DetectionBacteriologyGastroenterologyPathologyBiopsy SpecimensDermatologyBacterial PathogensMedical MicrobiologySurgical PathologyFood MicrobiologyInfection ControlMolecular DiagnosticsAerobic CulturingHealth SciencesHistopathologyClinical MicrobiologyMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesM. Ulcerans DiseaseMicrobial DiseaseBuruli UlcerGastrointestinal PathologyMicrobiologyMycobacterium UlceransMedicineDiagnostic MicrobiologyM. Ulcerans
ABSTRACT Punch biopsy specimens from Mycobacterium ulcerans disease lesions were used to compare the sensitivities and specificities of direct smear, culture, PCR, and histopathology in making a diagnosis of M. ulcerans disease in a field setting. PCR for the insertion element IS 2404 was modified to include uracil- N -glycosylase and deoxyuridine triphosphate instead of deoxythymidine triphosphate to reduce the risk of cross contamination. The “gold standard” for confirmation of clinically diagnosed Buruli ulcer was a definite histological diagnosis, a positive culture for M. ulcerans , or a smear positive for acid-fast bacilli (AFB), together with a possible histological diagnosis. For 70 clinically diagnosed cases of M. ulcerans disease, the modified PCR was 98% sensitive and gave a rapid result. The sensitivities of microscopy, culture, and histology were 42%, 49%, and 82%, respectively. The use of a 4-mm punch biopsy specimen was preferred to a 6-mm punch biopsy specimen since the wound was less likely to bleed and to need stitching. Given adequate technical expertise and the use of controls, the PCR was viable in a teaching hospital setting in Ghana; and in routine practice, we would recommend the use of Ziehl-Neelsen staining of biopsy specimens to detect AFB, followed by PCR, in AFB-negative cases only, in order to minimize costs. Histology and culture remain important as quality control tests, particularly in studies of treatment efficacy.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1