International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids · 1993 · 17 citations · 31 references
EngineeringChemical EngineeringComputational EngineeringComputational Fluid DynamicsHeat TransferTransport PhenomenaConvergence AnalysisFinite Difference MethodsMass TransferNumerical ConvergenceNumerical Methods For Differential EquationsAdsorption ModelingComputational EfficiencyComputational Efficiency AnalysisConvection-diffusion ModelingEuler-lagrange EquationsEuler-lagrange ModelingFinite Difference SchemesNumerical Simulation Of Flow And Transport
Abstract Eight numerical schemes (first‐order upstream finite difference, MacCormack, explicit Taylor–Galerkin, random choice, flux‐corrected transport, ENO, TVD, and Euler–Lagrange methods) are compared on the basis of their computational efficiency for one‐dimensional non‐linear convection–diffusion problems. For the ideal chromatographic equation for which an exact solution exists, errors plotted against computational times show that the best methods are the random choice, Euler–Lagrange and flux‐corrected MacCormack methods. Even when significant diffusion is added to the model, steep gradients are possible because of non‐linearities. In such an instance, the random choice and flux‐corrected transport methods give the best performance. One can now tackle more complicated problems and refer to this comparative study in order to choose an adequate numerical method which will provide sufficiently accurate results at a reasonable cost.
31
High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws
Ami Harten · Journal of Computational Physics · 1983 · 4.1K citations · Full text
Peter D. Lax, Burton Wendroff · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · 1960 · 2.6K citations