International and Comparative Law Quarterly · 2004 · 154 citations · 4 references
LawConflict StudiesHuman Rights LawExecutive PowerHuman RightsInternational Humanitarian LawCrimes Against HumanityDetention In Armed ConflictDetention PolicyEmergency Detention PowersPretrial DetentionWar CrimesCombatant DetentionExcessive PunishmentExecutive Detention AuthorityHuman Rights MechanismsMass DetentionPretrial Detention Under Human Rights LawSpecialized TribunalsState Executive Branches
The most powerful democracy is detaining hundreds of suspected foot soldiers of the Taliban in a legal black hole at the United States naval base at Guantanamo Bay, where they await trial on capital charges by military tribunals. This episode must be put in context. Democracies must defend themselves. Democracies are entitled to try officers and soldiers of enemy forces for war crimes. But it is a recurring theme in history that in times of war, armed conflict, or perceived national danger, even liberal democracies adopt measures infringing human rights in ways that are wholly disproportionate to the crisis. One tool at hand is detention without charge or trial, that is, executive detention. Ill-conceived rushed legislation is passed granting excessive powers to executive governments which compromise the rights and liberties of individuals beyond the exigencies of the situation. Often the loss of liberty is permanent. Executive branches of government, faced with a perceived emergency, often resort to excessive measures. The litany of grave abuses of power by liberal democratic governments is too long to recount, but in order to understand and to hold governments to account, we do well to take intoaccount the circles of history.
4
Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-citizens in the War against Terrorism
George W. Bush · 6 · 2001 · 66 citations
Law, Criminal Law, International Law +12
Knee Discomfort in a 38-year-old Man
Richard S. Irwin · CHEST Journal · 2002 · 23 citations
Microbe Magazine · 2012 · 17 citations · Full text