Publication | Closed Access
Fluid interaction for information visualization
250
Citations
43
References
2011
Year
Real-time VisualizationEngineeringVisualization (Graphics)Data VisualizationVisualization (Data Visualization)New VisualizationCommunicationFluid InteractionInteractive VisualizationVisual DesignData ScienceGraphic DesignComputational VisualizationVisual AnalyticsBusiness VisualizationVisualization (Cognitive Psychology)DesignUser ExperienceVisualization PractitionersVisualization (Biomedical Imaging)Visualization ResearchMedia DesignArts
Interaction is often overlooked in visualization research, yet it is essential for user dialogue with data and ultimately for understanding and insight. This article aims to provide practical design guidelines by compiling examples of best‑in‑class interaction. The authors introduce the concept of fluid interaction, defined through direct manipulation, embodied interaction, flow, and Norman's execution and evaluation gulfs.
Despite typically receiving little emphasis in visualization research, interaction in visualization is the catalyst for the user's dialogue with the data, and, ultimately, the user's actual understanding and insight into these data. There are many possible reasons for this skewed balance between the visual and interactive aspects of a visualization. One reason is that interaction is an intangible concept that is difficult to design, quantify, and evaluate. Unlike for visual design, there are few examples that show visualization practitioners and researchers how to design the interaction for a new visualization in the best manner. In this article, we attempt to address this issue by collecting examples of visualizations with ‘best-in-class’ interaction and using them to extract practical design guidelines for future designers and researchers. We call this concept fluid interaction, and we propose an operational definition in terms of the direct manipulation and embodied interaction paradigms, the psychological concept of ‘flow’, and Norman's gulfs of execution and evaluation.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1