Aquatic Microbial Ecology · 2001 · 64 citations · 61 references
Life SciencesMarine BiologyOceanographyChemical OceanographyMarine EcologyMicrobial EcologyAquatic Microbial EcologyMarine Microbial MetabolismMarine Microbial PhysiologyMarine PollutantsMicrobial BiogeochemistryOcean EcologyBiological Nutrient RemovalDimethylsulfoniopropionate CyclingDimethylsulfoniopropionate DegradationSeawater ChemistrySolar Radiation TransferSurface Absorbed Solar RadiationSurface Solar RadiationSurface Water Microbial Ecology
AME Aquatic Microbial Ecology Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsSpecials AME 25:87-97 (2001) - doi:10.3354/ame025087 Impact of solar radiation on the biological removal of dimethylsulfoniopropionate and dimethylsulfide in marine surface waters Doris Slezak1,*, Albert Brugger1, Gerhard J. Herndl2 1Dept of Marine Biology, Institute of Ecology and Conservation Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria 2Dept of Biological Oceanography, Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, PO Box 59, 1797 AB Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands *Present address: Institute of Limnology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Mondseestrasse 9, 5310 Mondsee, Austria. E-mail: doris.slezak@oeaw.ac.at ABSTRACT: The effect of natural surface solar radiation on the biological removal of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) and dimethylsulfide (DMS) was determined and compared to the photochemical removal of DMSP and DMS. Natural bacterial assemblages (0.8 μm filtered seawater) from the northern Adriatic Sea and the coastal North Sea were exposed to surface solar radiation and incubated in the dark; the DMSP and DMS concentrations were measured concurrently. Photochemical removal rates were determined in 0.2 μm filtered seawater. Biological removal of DMSP in the light was 62 ± 14% lower than the biological removal rate obtained in the dark. High spatial and temporal variability in the biological removal rates was observed for the dark treatments, as well as for its sensivity to solar radiation, with rates for light treatments varying from 29 to 81% of those in the dark. The DMSP concentration above which no further increase of the biological DMSP removal rate was observed was substantially lower in the light treatments (~30 nM) than in the dark treatments (>80 nM). UV-B radiation only accounted for a minor inhibitory effect (~15% of total inhibition), whereas UV-A and PAR (photosynthetically active radiation) both contributed ~42% of total inhibition. Biological DMS removal under solar radiation was only ~40 ± 14% of the biological DMS removal in the dark. Under surface solar radiation, photochemical removal was always higher than the dark biological removal. Our results indicate therefore, that the DMSP and DMS dynamics in the oceanic surface waters are severely influenced by solar radiation due to the partial inhibition of the microbial consortia responsible for DMSP and DMS turnover. KEY WORDS: DMSP · DMS · Ultraviolet (UV) radiation · Bacteria · Biological removal · Photochemical alteration Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in AME Vol. 25, No. 1. Online publication date: August 10, 2001 Print ISSN: 0948-3055; Online ISSN: 1616-1564 Copyright © 2001 Inter-Research.
61
Applied Linear Statistical Models
Eric R. Ziegel, John Neter, William Wasserman et al. · Technometrics · 1992 · 10K citations
Applied Linear Statistical Models
Michael Kutner · Technometrics · 1997 · 7.3K citations · Full text
Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate
Robert J. Charlson, J. E. Lovelock, Meinrat O. Andreae et al. · Nature · 1987 · 4.4K citations