Publication | Closed Access
Analysing the effect of process variation to reduce parametric yield loss
11
Citations
12
References
2008
Year
Unknown Venue
EngineeringProcess VariationIndustrial EngineeringAgricultural EconomicsYield PredictionProductivityPhysical Design (Electronics)Reliability EngineeringYield ManagementYield OptimizationModeling And SimulationYield EngineeringElectronic PackagingProcess OptimizationParametric Yield LossSemiconductor ManufacturersDevice ModelingElectrical EngineeringProcess OptimisationHardware ReliabilityMonte-carlo ModellingComputer EngineeringProcess EngineeringYield (Engineering)MicroelectronicsProcess Simulation ModelProcess ControlBusinessCircuit Simulation
For several decades, the output from semiconductor manufacturers has been high volume products with process optimisation being continued throughout the lifetime of the product to ensure a satisfactory yield. However, product lifetimes are continually shrinking to keep pace with market demands. Furthermore there is an increase in dasiafoundrypsila business where product volumes are low; consequently it is no longer feasible to optimise the process during the product lifetime resulting in an increase in parametric yield loss. This paper describes the use a combination of two statistical tools namely Design of Experiments (DoE) and Response Surface Modelling (RSM) which permit the identification and modelling of those process parameters whose variation which will impact most on the performance of a circuit. The efficiency of this approach, compared to using a Monte Carlo analysis, is demonstrated with respect to a Mutual Exclusion Element (MUTEX) which is used extensively in synchronisers where process variations can have considerable impact on circuit performance. To obtain the same modelling accuracy, the Monte Carlo approach would require large number of simulations compared to nine using the DoE scheme with the low computational overhead. This method can be used by semiconductor manufacturers and design house alike to bridge the gap between manufacture and design.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1