Augmentative and Alternative Communication · 2007 · 120 citations · 32 references
Social SciencesCommunicationAssistive TechnologyCommunication Research MethodsOutcomes ResearchAlternative CommunicationAlternative Communication SystemsAugmentative CommunicationSupportive CommunicationAac InterventionAlternative Communication DevicesAlternative Communication InterventionAugmentative Communication DevicesAugmentative Communication InterventionCommunity Support StructuresCommunity Support SystemsDisability Family Support
Improving outcomes for AAC users requires understanding factors that help or hinder success. The study interviewed seven long‑term AAC users, their families, and professionals to identify contextual factors influencing outcomes. The study found that attitude, cultural, technological, and service delivery barriers hindered outcomes, while community, family support, personal traits, and high‑quality AAC services promoted positive results.
In order to improve outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), it is important to understand what factors contribute to or detract from positive outcomes. Seven young men who had used AAC systems for at least 15 years, their family members, and professionals who had worked with them, participated in the study. Qualitative interviews were used to identify contextual factors that may have contributed (both positively and negatively) to the young men's outcomes. Factors that impeded positive outcomes included: attitude barriers, cultural differences, technological barriers, and service delivery limitations. Contributions to positive outcomes included: community support, parent and family support, personal characteristics, and appropriate and high-quality AAC services. The results are discussed with implications for clinical practice and directions for future research.
32
G. E. Berrios, J. Hodges · 2000 · 866 citations
David McNaughton, Janice Light, Kara A. Arnold · Augmentative and Alternative Communication · 2002 · 130 citations