Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2010 · 268 citations · 44 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyChemotherapyMolecular OncologyPrecision OncologyBiomarker-guided Therapy SelectionCancer BiomarkersImmuno-oncology BiomarkersLung CancerMolecular Tumor ProfilingTargeted Cancer TherapyCetuximab TherapyEgfr InhibitionEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor InhibitionMolecular Prognostic MarkersNon-small Cell Lung Cancer TherapyNon-small Cell Lung Cancer TreatmentOncogenic Ras MutationsPredictive Tumor Markers
PURPOSE The anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab is efficacious in multiple tumor types. Patient selection with markers predictive of benefit may enhance its therapeutic index. This retrospective, correlative analysis of the phase III trial BMS099 of cetuximab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was conducted to identify molecular markers for the selection of patients most likely to benefit from cetuximab. METHODS In BMS099, 676 chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or stage IV NSCLC of any histology or EGFR expression status were randomly assigned to taxane/carboplatin (T/C) with or without cetuximab. Biomarkers analyzed included K-Ras and EGFR mutations by direct sequencing, EGFR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and EGFR gene copy number by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Relationships between biomarker status and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR) were assessed by log-rank tests per treatment arm for treatment-specific effects and across the total evaluable population. Results Tumor samples were available from 225 randomly assigned patients. K-Ras mutations were found in 17% of evaluable patients (35 of 202 patients), EGFR mutations were found in 10% (17 of 166 patients), EGFR positivity by IHC was found in 89% (131 of 148 patients), and FISH positivity was found in 52% (54 of 104 patients). No significant associations were found between biomarker status and PFS, OS, and ORR in the treatment-specific analyses. CONCLUSION In contrast with colorectal cancer, and within the limitations of the data set, efficacy parameters did not appear to correlate with K-Ras mutation status or with any of the EGFR-related biomarkers evaluated. Additional exploratory analyses are essential to identify predictive markers and to optimize patient selection for cetuximab therapy in NSCLC.
44
<i>EGFR</i> Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy
J. Guillermo Paez, Pasi A. Jänne, Jeffrey C. Lee et al. · Science · 2004 · 9.4K citations
Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Tony Mok, Yi‐Long Wu, Sumitra Thongprasert et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2009 · 8.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +13
Radiotherapy plus Cetuximab for Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
James A. Bonner, Paul M. Harari, J. Giralt et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2006 · 5.1K citations · Full text
Cetuximab and Chemotherapy as Initial Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Eric Van Cutsem, Claus-Henning Köhne, Erika Hitre et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2009 · 3.9K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17