Labor Unrest, Immigration, and Ethnic Conflict in Urban America, 1880-1914

Susan Olzak

American Journal of Sociology · 1989 · 193 citations · 41 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study investigates whether strikes influence the extent of ethnic and racial conflicts in late 19th‑ and early 20th‑century America. Using data on conflicts and violence in the 81 largest U.S. cities from 1880 to 1914, the authors link the growth of the union movement and the rise of low‑wage labor supply to increased ethnic competition and higher rates of ethnic conflict. Results show that ethnic conflict and labor unrest are parallel collective actions driven by the number and founding of national labor unions, with the strongest effect on attacks against blacks, and that immigration surges, economic downturns, and contagion processes further raise conflict rates.

Abstract

Did strikes effect the extent of ethnic and racial conflicts in late 19th-and early 20th-century America? If so, How? Data on the occurrence of conflicts and of violence against various ethnic or racial groups in the 81 largest cities, 1880-1914, show that the growth of the union movement and the rising supply of low-wage labor increased levels of ethnic competition in urban labor markets, thus raising rates of ethnic comflict. The findings support the argument that ethnic conflict and labor unrest are parallel forms of collective action and that each depends on the number and foundings of national labor unions. The effect of labor union organization is strongest for all attacks on blacks. In addition, sharp increases in immigration, a downturn in economic fortunes, and contagion processes all raise rates of ethnic conflict.

References

41