Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Information Provided by Different Structural Load Path Definitions

Kun Marhadi, Satchi Venkataraman

International Journal for Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization · 2009 · 35 citations · 7 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The structural mechanics community has developed several methods to identify and visualize load paths, but no single accepted approach exists to characterize, quantify, visualize, and tailor load paths. This paper compares various methods proposed to characterize and visualize load paths. The comparison is performed on a two‑dimensional rectangular plate under plane stress conditions with different loading and boundary conditions, evaluating each method’s effectiveness. The methods yield different results and insights into load transfer mechanisms, with no single method clearly superior, though some provide more qualitative and quantitative information on load trajectory and efficiency.

Abstract

The structural mechanics community has developed several methods to identify and visualize load paths in structures. There is no single accepted approach or method to characterize, quantify, visualize and tailor load paths. This paper compares various methods proposed to characterize and visualize load paths. The comparison is performed for a two-dimensional (2-D) rectangular plate under plane stress conditions arising from different loading and boundary conditions. The effectiveness of each method is compared. The comparisons shows the methods provide different results and insights into the load transfer mechanisms. No single method appears to emerge as a clear choice for characterizing load paths. However, some methods provide more qualitative and quantitative information on the trajectory and efficiency of load transferred along load paths.

References

7