Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs · 1993 · 43 citations · 30 references
PharmacyClinical PharmacokineticsPharmacokineticsBioequivalenceBioequivalence RegulationClinical PharmacologyBioequivalence AssessmentBioequivalence RequirementsBioequivalence Study DesignClinical Equivalence AssessmentInternational Regulatory HarmonizationStatistical Analysis Of BioequivalenceAverage Bioavailability AssessmentFda Drug RegulationFda RegulationIntrasubject BioequivalencePharmacokinetic Bioequivalence AssessmentPharmacokinetic Equivalence CriteriaRegulatory Bioequivalence CriteriaRegulatory Requirements
International harmonization of bioequivalence regulations has advanced, with consensus on equivalence for pharmacokinetic lack‑of‑interaction studies, ongoing debate over food‑interaction studies, and expanding applications to batch‑to‑batch equivalence and dose linearity. The paper aims to evaluate replicate designs for assessing intrasubject variability equivalence and to determine clinically relevant bioequivalence ranges based on therapeutic ranges and variability. Replicate designs enable simultaneous assessment of average bioavailability and intrasubject variability equivalence. All major health authorities now accept the multiplicative model with log‑transformed AUC and Cmax and the 0.80–1.25 bioequivalence range.
International harmonization of regulatory requirements for bioequivalence studies has made major progress during the last years, particular with regard to the bioequivalence range and statistical analysis. The multiplicative model and hence the logarithmic transformation of the primary extent and rate characteristics AUC and Cmax and - in consistency with this - the bioequivalence range of (0.80, 1.25) are now accepted by all major health authorities including the European CPMP, the U.S. FDA and the Canadian HPB. There is also far-reaching consensus that "pharmacokinetic lack of interaction" studies have to be handled as an equivalence problem. Such a consensus is still missing for "lack of food interaction" studies, although the same methodology has to be applied if a corresponding claim is made in the labeling of a particular formulation. Further applications of the equivalence concept include "batch-to-batch equivalence" and "pharmacokinetic dose linearity" studies. Replicate designs, which so far have been rarely used, may gain importance because they allow the assessment of the equivalence of intrasubject variability in addition to the equivalence of average bioavailability. A major issue to be addressed in the near future is the appropriate choice of clinically relevant bioequivalence ranges based on therapeutic ranges and intrasubject variabilities.
30
Symmetrical Confidence Intervals for Bioequivalence Trials
Wilfred J. Westlake · Biometrics · 1976 · 342 citations