New Journal of Physics · 2009 · 593 citations · 58 references
ComputingComputer SciencePhysicsCryptographyInformation TheoryQuantum MechanicsQuantum CommunicationQuantum CryptographyQuantum Information TheoryQuantum StatesBell InequalitiesDevice-independent Quantum CommunicationDevice-independent Quantum Key DistributionMeasurement-device-independent Quantum Key DistributionQuantum Key Distribution
Device‑independent quantum key distribution relaxes the security assumptions of conventional QKD by relying solely on quantum physics and Bell inequality violations, without assuming trusted device internals. The paper presents a detailed security proof for a DIQKD protocol and discusses loophole issues in Bell experiments. The security proof exploits the full structure of quantum theory, unlike no‑signaling‑based proofs, and is valid against collective attacks where the eavesdropper acts independently and identically on each round. The proof is limited to collective attacks, assuming the eavesdropper acts independently and identically.
Device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD) represents a relaxation of the security assumptions made in usual quantum key distribution (QKD). As in usual QKD, the security of DIQKD follows from the laws of quantum physics, but contrary to usual QKD, it does not rely on any assumptions about the internal working of the quantum devices used in the protocol. In this paper, we present in detail the security proof for a DIQKD protocol introduced in Acín et al (2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 230501). This proof exploits the full structure of quantum theory (as opposed to other proofs that exploit only the no-signaling principle), but only holds against collective attacks, where the eavesdropper is assumed to act on the quantum systems of the honest parties independently and identically in each round of the protocol (although she can act coherently on her systems at any time). The security of any DIQKD protocol necessarily relies on the violation of a Bell inequality. We discuss the issue of loopholes in Bell experiments in this context.
58
<i>Quantum Computation and Quantum Information</i>
Michael A. Nielsen, Isaac L. Chuang, Lov K. Grover · American Journal of Physics · 2002 · 22.7K citations
Quantum computation and quantum information
Jim Law · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · 2001 · 19.2K citations
Computing, Computer Science, Physics +13
Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
Artur Ekert · Physical Review Letters · 1991 · 10.7K citations
Computing, Physics, Cryptography +16
Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
John F. Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony et al. · Physical Review Letters · 1969 · 7.6K citations · Full text
H. J. Kimble · Nature · 2008 · 5.8K citations · Full text