Decreasing abundance of leaf-cutting ants across a chronosequence of advancing Atlantic forest regeneration

Paulo Sávio Damásio da Silva, Ana Gabriela Delgado Bieber, Inara R. Leal, Rainer Wirth, Marcelo Tabarelli

Journal of Tropical Ecology · 2009 · 38 citations · 23 references

Concepts

Abstract

Leaf-cutting ants (species of Atta and Acromyrmex ) are dominant herbivores and play a key role as ecosystem engineers of tropical and subtropical America (Fowler et al . 1989, Weber 1972). Not only are they among the most polyphagous and voracious herbivorous insects, cutting up to 15% y −1 of the leaf standing crop (Urbas et al . 2007, Wirth et al . 2003), but also they strongly affect the light environment and the nature of plant assemblages via ant-nest-mediated disturbances (Farji-Brener & Illes 2000, Hull-Sanders & Howard 2003, Moutinho et al . 2003). Some leaf-cutting ant species have turned into an omnipresent feature of present-day neotropical landscapes and a wealth of studies has documented their abundance to drastically increase with increasing agricultural land use, disturbance and deforestation/fragmentation (Fowler et al . 1986, Jaffe 1986, Terborgh et al . 2001, Vasconcelos & Cherrett 1995, Wirth et al . 2007). In view of their ecosystem engineering capacity and the ever-increasing conversion of tropical forests into agricultural landscapes (Wright 2005), it has been concluded that disturbance-driven accumulation of Atta colonies leads to far-reaching and deleterious consequences in present-day neotropical landscapes (Wirth et al . 2008). But what about the opposite scenario of regenerating forests? Is disturbance-mediated hyper-abundance of leaf-cutting ants a reversible phenomenon? We believe that this question is highly relevant because (1) knowledge of the dynamics of leaf-cutting ant populations during forest regeneration is lacking and (2) natural secondary succession has become a widespread phenomenon after land is abandoned or temporarily fallowed (Wright 2005). In the Brazilian Amazon during the 1990s, for example, secondary forests have reclaimed 31% of the once deforested land (Perz & Skole 2003).

References

23