The Astrophysical Journal · 2007 · 115 citations · 39 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsObservational AstronomyX-ray AstronomyHigh-energy Astrophysical SourcesX-ray Data AnalysisX-ray Source CatalogsCosmic Ray Background MeasurementMultiwavelength ObservationsPoint SourcesPower-law ModelSource Number CountsX-ray Background Source CountsX-ray Background SpectrumX-ray Luminosity Functions
We present the Chandra Multiwavelength Project (ChaMP) X-ray point source number counts and cosmic X-ray background (CXRB) flux densities in multiple energy bands. From the ChaMP X-ray point source catalog, ~5500 sources are selected, covering 9.6 deg2 in sky area. To quantitatively characterize the sensitivity and completeness of the ChaMP sample, we perform extensive simulations. We also include the ChaMP+CDFs (Chandra Deep Fields) number counts to cover large flux ranges from 2 × 10-17 to 2.4 × 10-12 (0.5-2 keV) and from 2 × 10-16 to 7.1 × 10-12 (2-8 keV) ergs cm-2 s-1. The ChaMP and the ChaMP+CDFs differential number counts are well fitted with a broken power law. The best-fit faint and bright power indices are 1.49 ± 0.02 and 2.36 ± 0.05 (0.5-2 keV), and 1.58 ± 0.01 and 2.59img1.gif (2-8 keV), respectively. We detect breaks in the differential number counts that appear at different fluxes in different energy bands. Assuming a single power-law model for a source spectrum, we find that the same population(s) of soft X-ray sources causes the break in the differential number counts for all energy bands. We measure the resolved CXRB flux densities from the ChaMP and the ChaMP+CDFs number counts with and without bright target sources. By adding the known unresolved CXRB to the ChaMP+CDF resolved CXRB, we also estimate total CXRB flux densities. The fractions of the resolved CXRB without target sources are 78% ± 1% and 81% ± 2% in the 0.5-2 and 2-8 keV bands, respectively, somewhat lower than but generally consistent with earlier numbers because of their large errors. These fractions increase by ~1% when target sources are included.
39
Confidence limits for small numbers of events in astrophysical data
N. Gehrels · The Astrophysical Journal · 1986 · 2.4K citations
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +12
The Bell Laboratories H I survey
A. A. Stark, Charles F. Gammie, R. W. Wilson et al. · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 1992 · 849 citations
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +14
Deep Extragalactic X-Ray Surveys
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2005 · 473 citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +17
Resolving the extragalactic hard X-ray background
R. F. Mushotzky, L. L. Cowie, A. J. Barger et al. · Nature · 2000 · 467 citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +10