Age-relation, reliability and grammatical validity of measures of utterance length

Jean A. Rondal, Martine Ghiotto, Serge Brédart, Jean-François Bachelet

Journal of Child Language · 1987 · 86 citations · 17 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Previous research by Klee & Fitzgerald (1985) reported different results. The study assessed how utterance‑length measures relate to age, reliability, and grammatical validity in 21 normally developing children aged 1.8–2.8 years. The authors measured MLU‑like indices in spontaneous speech of those children to examine age correlation, reliability, and grammatical validity. The results showed that utterance‑length measures correlate well with age, are reliable, and predict grammatical development, but beyond certain developmental thresholds their reliability and validity deteriorate, making them sound only below those points.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study evaluated the age-relationship, intra-sample reliability and grammatical validity of MLU-like measures of utterance length in the free speech of 21 normally developing children aged 1;8 to 2;8 with MLU between 1·05 and 3·06. Contrary to a previous study by Klee & Fitzgerald (1985). it was found that measures of utterance length hold a good relation with age, are reliable and predict grammatical development well in the age and MLU range considered. It is argued that there are identifiable points in the developmental evolution of MLU and MLU-like indices beyond which their reliability and validity have serious problems. Below these points, they constitute sound measures of syntactic development.

References

17