Geographies of resilience

Juergen Weichselgartner, Ilan Kelman

Progress in Human Geography · 2014 · 484 citations · 52 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Resilience is shifting from a descriptive to a normative concept in disaster science, presenting both challenges and opportunities. The authors argue that effective resilience requires integrating normative and descriptive approaches, emphasizing structural social‑political processes, acknowledging ecosystem‑society differences, and combining diverse knowledge to create context‑appropriate, socially robust strategies. They outline the resilience concept and review recent international resilience‑building initiatives to illuminate key questions and overlooked issues.

Abstract

In disaster science, policy and practice, the transition of resilience from a descriptive concept to a normative agenda provides challenges and opportunities. This paper argues that both are needed to increase resilience. We briefly outline the concept and several recent international resilience-building efforts to elucidate critical questions and less-discussed issues. We highlight the need to move resilience thinking forward by emphasizing structural social-political processes, acknowledging and acting on differences between ecosystems and societies, and looking beyond the quantitative streamlining of resilience into one index. Instead of imposing a technical-reductionist framework, we suggest a starting basis of integrating different knowledge types and experiences to generate scientifically reliable, context-appropriate and socially robust resilience-building activities.

References

52