Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering · 2013 · 402 citations · 9 references
EngineeringCivil EngineeringGeological EngineeringGeotechnical EngineeringMechanical Behavior Of MaterialsRock MechanicsJointed Rock Mass BehaviorRock Mass CharacterizationRock StrengthShear PropertiesShear StrengthShear Strength Of RocksApparent CohesionCohesionFrictional StrengthHoek-brown CriterionMohr-coulomb CriterionMohr-coulomb Shear StrengthMohr-coulomb Strength CriterionShear Testing
Rock shear strength testing shows that intact rocks can reach a critical confining pressure causing a horizontal Mohr envelope, while jointed and massed rocks display high friction angles at low stress and complex cohesion–friction interactions that cannot be summed linearly. The authors propose replacing the conventional “c + σn tan φ” criterion with “c then σn tan φ” to better reflect reality and call for further research to correct long‑standing errors. Cohesion is released at small strains, after which friction is mobilized and persists throughout the remainder of the shear deformation. The critical state has been more precisely defined, revealing the correct curvature or deviation from linear Mohr–Coulomb behavior.
Although many intact rock types can be very strong, a critical confining pressure can eventually be reached in triaxial testing, such that the Mohr shear strength envelope becomes horizontal. This critical state has recently been better defined, and correct curvature or correct deviation from linear Mohr–Coulomb (M-C) has finally been found. Standard shear testing procedures for rock joints, using multiple testing of the same sample, in case of insufficient samples, can be shown to exaggerate apparent cohesion. Even rough joints do not have any cohesion, but instead have very high friction angles at low stress, due to strong dilation. Rock masses, implying problems of large-scale interaction with engineering structures, may have both cohesive and frictional strength components. However, it is not correct to add these, following linear M-C or nonlinear Hoek–Brown (H-B) standard routines. Cohesion is broken at small strain, while friction is mobilized at larger strain and remains to the end of the shear deformation. The criterion 'c then σn tan φ' should replace 'c plus σntan φ' for improved fit to reality. Transformation of principal stresses to a shear plane seems to ignore mobilized dilation, and caused great experimental difficulties until understood. There seems to be plenty of room for continued research, so that errors of judgement of the last 50 years can be corrected.
9