Energies · 2015 · 18 citations · 6 references
ManagementStrategic ManagementStrategyCarbon ManagementCorporate StrategyEnvironmental Decision-makingCarbon Emissions ManagementCarbon Risk ManagementCorporate Climate StrategyCorporate Environmental StrategyFossil Fuel PolicyCarbon Risk StrategyCorporate Carbon ManagementCorporate Global StrategyDivestment CampaignsElectric Power Sector DecarbonizationInvestment Risk AnalysisInvestment Risk AssessmentInvestment Risk Taking
German electricity giants have recently taken high-level decisions to remove selected fossil fuel operations from their company portfolio. This new corporate strategy could be seen as a direct response to the growing global influence of the fossil fuel divestment campaign. In this paper we ask whether the divestment movement currently exerts significant influence on decision-making at the top four German energy giants—E.On, RWE, Vattenfall and EnBW. We find that this is not yet the case. After describing the trajectory of the global fossil fuel divestment campaign, we outline four alternative influences on corporate strategy that, currently, are having a greater impact than the divestment movement on Germany’s power sector. In time, however, clear political decisions and strong civil support may increase the significance of climate change concerns in the strategic management of the German electricity giants.
6
How Large Are Global Energy Subsidies?
David Coady, Ian Parry, Louis Martin Sears et al. · IMF Working Paper · 2015 · 314 citations
Energy Transition. The German Energiewende
Craig Morris, Martin Pehnt, Dorothee Landgrebe et al. · 2012 · 75 citations