Validation of the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) retrospective forcing over the southern Great Plains

Lifeng Luo, Alan Robock, Kenneth E. Mitchell, Paul R. Houser, Eric F. Wood, John C. Schaake, Dag Lohmann, B. Cosgrove, Fenghua Wen, Justin Sheffield,

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2003 · 170 citations · 28 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Atmospheric forcing is critical for NLDAS, and its quality directly impacts NLDAS outputs and model improvement efforts. The study compares simulations forced by standard NLDAS versus station‑observed meteorology to assess the impact of forcing differences on land surface modeling. The authors generated a three‑year retrospective forcing dataset from the Eta Data Assimilation System and observations, ran NLDAS land surface models, and compared the resulting gridded forcing with station observations from Oklahoma Mesonet and ARM/CRTB. Forcing variables show small differences from station observations except precipitation, which aligns better at longer timescales; a small high bias in downward solar radiation and a low bias in downward longwave radiation were noted, yet the resulting soil moisture and temperature simulations differed only slightly, indicating NLDAS retrospective forcing is an excellent dataset for land surface modeling over the southern Great Plains.

Abstract

Atmospheric forcing used by land surface models is a critical component of the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) and its quality crucially affects the final product of NLDAS and our work on model improvement. A three‐year (September 1996–September 1999) retrospective forcing data set was created from the Eta Data Assimilation System and observations and used to run the NLDAS land surface models for this period. We compared gridded NLDAS forcing with station observations obtained from networks including the Oklahoma Mesonet and Atmospheric Radiation Measurement/Cloud and Radiation Testbed at the southern Great Plains. Differences in all forcing variables except precipitation between the NLDAS forcing data set and station observations are small at all timescales. While precipitation data do not agree very well at an hourly timescale, they do agree better at longer timescales because of the way NLDAS precipitation forcing is generated. A small high bias in downward solar radiation and a low bias in downward longwave radiation exist in the retrospective forcing. To investigate the impact of these differences on land surface modeling we compared two sets of model simulations, one forced by the standard NLDAS product and one with station‐observed meteorology. The differences in the resulting simulations of soil moisture and soil temperature for each model were small, much smaller than the differences between the models and between the models and observations. This indicates that NLDAS retrospective forcing provides an excellent state‐of‐the‐art data set for land surface modeling, at least over the southern Great Plains region.

References

28