PLoS ONE · 2012 · 63 citations · 30 references
EngineeringNeuroscienceMotor ControlMotor NeuroscienceNeural EngineeringBrain-computer InterfacesContinuous ElectroencephalographyElectroencephalogram AnalysisElectroencephalogram Signal ProcessingElectroencephalographyMental ImageryEeg Feature ExtractionEeg Signal ProcessingElectroencephalography Feature ExtractionElectroencephalography-based Brain-computer InterfacesIndependent Component AnalysisMotor Imagery ClassificationResting-state EegSignal-to-noise Ratio
Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) often use spatial filters to improve signal-to-noise ratio of task-related EEG activities. To obtain robust spatial filters, large amounts of labeled data, which are often expensive and labor-intensive to obtain, need to be collected in a training procedure before online BCI control. Several studies have recently developed zero-training methods using a session-to-session scenario in order to alleviate this problem. To our knowledge, a state-to-state translation, which applies spatial filters derived from one state to another, has never been reported. This study proposes a state-to-state, zero-training method to construct spatial filters for extracting EEG changes induced by motor imagery. Independent component analysis (ICA) was separately applied to the multi-channel EEG in the resting and the motor imagery states to obtain motor-related spatial filters. The resultant spatial filters were then applied to single-trial EEG to differentiate left- and right-hand imagery movements. On a motor imagery dataset collected from nine subjects, comparable classification accuracies were obtained by using ICA-based spatial filters derived from the two states (motor imagery: 87.0%, resting: 85.9%), which were both significantly higher than the accuracy achieved by using monopolar scalp EEG data (80.4%). The proposed method considerably increases the practicality of BCI systems in real-world environments because it is less sensitive to electrode misalignment across different sessions or days and does not require annotated pilot data to derive spatial filters.
30
Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications
Aapo Hyvärinen, Erkki Oja · Neural Networks · 2000 · 8.8K citations
Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis
Benjamin Blankertz, Ryota Tomioka, Steven Lemm et al. · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · 2008 · 2.1K citations