Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology · 2012 · 31 citations · 15 references
DentistryDental Public HealthAdult OrthodonticsCommunity Oral HealthComprehensive Orthodontic TreatmentEpidemiology Of Oral DiseasesMalocclusion Risk AssessmentFamily Socioeconomic StatusGeographic Variation In MalocclusionHousehold Socioeconomic StatusMalocclusion Severity AssessmentOrthodontic Treatment Need PrevalenceOrthodontic Treatment NeedsUnivariate Analysis
Deli R, Macrì LA, Radico P, Pantanali F, Grieco DL, Gualano MR, La Torre G. Orthodontic treatment attitude versus orthodontic treatment need: differences by gender, age, socio‐economical status and geographical context. Community Dent Oral Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012; 40 (Suppl. 1): 71–76. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S Abstract – Objectives: To investigate the relationship between the attitude towards orthodontic treatment and the objective level of orthodontic need, and variables like gender, socioeconomic status and geographical context, among 6‐ to 16‐year‐old children. Methods: The attitude of 2284 Italian children towards orthodontics was assessed using the Child Orthodontic Attitude Survey (COAS) questionnaire, previously validated for Italian‐speaking children. The level of orthodontic need was evaluated by using the Risk of Malocclusion Assessment (ROMA) Index while socioeconomic status (SES) was based on parental job activities. The univariate analysis was performed using chi‐square tests to find differences between groups for categorical variables, while multivariate analyses were conducted using logistic regression models. Results: Individuals with a higher SES had a statistically significant lower need of orthodontic treatment ( P = 0.003). Children with a very high SES were from northern (20.8%) and central Italy (65.9%), while only 13.3% lived in southern Italy ( P < 0.001). Logistic regression showed that females, older children, in‐treatment subjects and children from the region of Puglia were more likely to have orthodontics (OR = 2.09; 95% CI: 1.66–2.64, OR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.01–1.15, OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.11–1.97, OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.05–1.95, respectively). Conclusions: The orthodontic treatment attitude largely depends on age, gender and geographical context but is not influenced by the real level of orthodontic therapy need.
15