Publication | Closed Access
WLD: A Robust Local Image Descriptor
1K
Citations
47
References
2009
Year
Face DetectionFacial Recognition SystemMachine VisionImage AnalysisFeature DetectionHuman Face DetectionPattern RecognitionEngineeringBiometricsComputer ScienceTexture AnalysisWeber Local DescriptorMedical Image ComputingRobust Local DescriptorLocalizationRobust FeatureComputer VisionSpatial Verification
Weber's Law suggests that human perception of a pattern depends on both stimulus change and its original intensity, motivating the development of the robust local descriptor WLD. The paper proposes the Weber Local Descriptor (WLD), a simple yet powerful local image descriptor. WLD is computed by combining a differential excitation term—ratio of a pixel’s intensity differences with its neighbors to its own intensity—and an orientation term given by the pixel’s gradient orientation, then forming a concatenated histogram. Experiments on texture databases Brodatz and KTH‑TIPS2‑a demonstrate that WLD outperforms Gabor and SIFT, while face‑detection tests on MIT+CMU, AR, and CMU profile datasets show performance comparable to state‑of‑the‑art methods.
Inspired by Weber's Law, this paper proposes a simple, yet very powerful and robust local descriptor, called the Weber Local Descriptor (WLD). It is based on the fact that human perception of a pattern depends not only on the change of a stimulus (such as sound, lighting) but also on the original intensity of the stimulus. Specifically, WLD consists of two components: differential excitation and orientation. The differential excitation component is a function of the ratio between two terms: One is the relative intensity differences of a current pixel against its neighbors, the other is the intensity of the current pixel. The orientation component is the gradient orientation of the current pixel. For a given image, we use the two components to construct a concatenated WLD histogram. Experimental results on the Brodatz and KTH-TIPS2-a texture databases show that WLD impressively outperforms the other widely used descriptors (e.g., Gabor and SIFT). In addition, experimental results on human face detection also show a promising performance comparable to the best known results on the MIT+CMU frontal face test set, the AR face data set, and the CMU profile test set.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1