Critical Care · 2006 · 157 citations · 11 references
MedicineNephrologyPharmacokineticsDialysisHemodialysisRenal Replacement TherapyContinuous Renal Replacement TherapyDialysate CompositionDialyzer MembranesPharmacokinetics In Critical IllnessRenal Blood FlowSolute ClearanceContinuous HemodialysisContinuous Renal Replacement Therapy ClearanceContinuous Veno-venous HemodialysisContinuous Veno-venous HemofiltrationConvective Solute RemovalDiffusive Solute RemovalMembrane PerformanceSolute Removal Kinetics
INTRODUCTION: The best modality, for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is currently uncertain and it is poorly understood how transport of different solutes, whether convective or diffusive, changes over time. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cross over study in a cohort of critically ill patients, comparing small (urea and creatinine) and middle (beta2 microglobulin) molecular weight solute clearance, filter lifespan and membrane performance over a period of 72 hours, during 15 continuous veno-venous dialysis (CVVHD) and 15 continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH)sessions. Both modalities were administered based on a prescription of 35 ml/kg/h and using polyacrylonitrile filters. RESULTS: Median filter lifespan was significantly longer during CVVHD (37 hours, interquartile range (IQR) 19.5 to 72.5) than CVVH (19 hours, IQR 12.5 to 28) (p = 0.03). Median urea time weighted average (TWA) clearances were not significantly different during CVVH (31.6 ml/minute, IQR 23.2 to 38.9) and CVVHD (35.7 ml/minute, IQR 30.1 to 41.5) (p = 0.213). Similar results were found for creatinine: 38.1 ml/minute, IQR 28.5 to 39, and 35.6 ml/minute, IQR 26 to 43 (p = 0.917), respectively. Median beta2m TWA clearance was higher during convective (16.3 ml/minute, IQR 10.9 to 23) than diffusive (6.27 ml/minute, IQR 1.6 to 14.9) therapy; nonetheless this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.055). Median TWA adsorptive clearance of beta2m appeared to have scarce impact on overall solute removal (0.012 ml/minute, IQR -0.09 to 0.1, during hemofiltration versus -0.016 ml/minute, IQR -0.08 to 0.1 during dialysis; p = 0.79). Analysis of clearance modification over time did not show significant modifications of urea, creatinine and beta2m clearance in the first 48 hours during both treatments. In the CVVHD group, the only significant difference was found for beta2m between 72 hours and baseline clearance. CONCLUSION: Polyacrylonitrile filters during continuous hemofiltration and continuous hemodialysis delivered at 35 ml/kg/h are comparable in little and middle size solute removal. CVVHD appears to warrant longer CRRT sessions. The capacity of both modalities for removing such molecules is maintained up to 48 hours.
11
Catherine S. C. Bouman, Heleen M. Oudemans–van Straaten, Jan G.P. Tijssen et al. · Critical Care Medicine · 2002 · 655 citations
Diffusive vs. convective therapy
John A. Kellum, John P. Johnson, David J. Kramer et al. · Critical Care Medicine · 1998 · 231 citations
Medicine, Nephrology, Dialysis +12