International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids · 2011 · 21 citations · 11 references
ComputingMathematicsMechanical EngineeringAerodynamicsComputational Fluid DynamicsFluid DynamicsConvergence AnalysisFinite Difference MethodsFinite Volume MethodsNumerical AlgorithmsNumerical Methods For Differential EquationsAdjoint FormulationEuler EquationsFinite Volume DiscretizationSubsonic Flow Simulation
SUMMARY We examine the numerical solution of the adjoint quasi‐one‐dimensional Euler equations with a central‐difference finite volume scheme with Jameson‐Schmidt‐Turkel (JST) dissipation, for both the continuous and discrete approaches. First, the complete formulations and discretization of the quasi‐one‐dimensional Euler equations and the continuous adjoint equation and its counterpart, the discrete adjoint equation, are reviewed. The differences between the continuous and discrete boundary conditions are also explored. Second, numerical testing is carried out on a symmetric converging–diverging duct under subsonic flow conditions. This analysis reveals that the discrete adjoint scheme, while being manifestly less accurate than the continuous approach, gives nevertheless more accurate flow sensitivities. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
11
Aerodynamic design via control theory
Antony Jameson · Journal of Scientific Computing · 1988 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Algorithm Developments for Discrete Adjoint Methods
Michael B. Giles, Mihai C. Duta, Jens‐Dominik Müller et al. · AIAA Journal · 2003 · 327 citations
Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical Engineering +16