Reliability and Validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale

Robin S. Turpin, Ronald J. Ozminkowski, Claire Sharda, James J. Collins, Marc L. Berger, Gary M. Billotti, Catherine M. Baase, Michael J. Olson, Sean Nicholson

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · 2004 · 246 citations · 11 references

Concepts

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study reports the reliability and validity of the 13-item Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS). The SPS differs from similar scales by focusing on knowledge-based and production-based workers. METHODS: Data were obtained from administrative and medical claims databases and from a survey that incorporated the SPS, SF-36, and the Work Limitations Questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent (7797) of employees responded. Cronbach's alpha (0.83) indicates adequate reliability. Factor analysis identified two underlying factors, "completing work" and "avoiding distraction." Knowledge-based workers load on "completing work" (alpha = 0.97), whereas production-based workers load on "avoiding distraction" (alpha = 0.98). There were significant and positive relationships between the SPS, SF-36, and Work Limitations Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The SPS demonstrates a high degree of reliability and validity and may be ideal for employers who seek a single scale to measure health-related productivity in a diverse employee population.

References

11