Soil Science Society of America Journal · 2011 · 121 citations · 36 references
AgricultureForestrySoil SciencesForest OperationsSoil MechanicsSoil ScienceSoil Bulk Density SensingSoil CompactionSoil DensitySoil Physical PropertiesSoil RehabilitationBulk DensityForwarder Soil CompactionProctor Compaction TestSoil Bulk DensitySoil Bulk Density MonitoringSoil Compaction DynamicsSoil Property ChangesTraffic-induced Soil Compaction
Our research explored the impact of forest machinery on soil when trafficking off-road through forest stands. In particular, we assessed soil compaction caused by harvesting operations. This study had two objectives: (i) Quantify the increase of soil bulk density (absolute and relative density) by forest machinery; and (ii) Analyze the persistence of soil compaction over a 5-yr period. Our research was innovative in three respects; 1. We assessed in-place soil density at exactly the same locations pre- and posttreatment with a nuclear moisture and density gauge. In this context, we consider treatment as forest machinery (harvester and forwarder) trafficking on forest soil. 2. After the treatment, we monitored soil density at identical locations through yearly assessments for 5 yr to identify possible natural rehabilitation patterns. 3. We related the measured field bulk densities to site specific maximum bulk densities derived by standard Proctor tests (concept of relative bulk density) to get a better understanding of the severity of off-road traffic impact on soil density changes. Our key findings on two research sites were: 1. On average, dry soil bulk density increased by 19% in machine tracks. 2. Machine impact was not just limited to vehicle tracks; we noticed an increase of soil bulk density >10% in 14 of 65 (21.5%) locations extending up to 1 m away from tracks. 3. Due to machine impact, field bulk density increases exceeded the 80% maximum bulk density threshold at 32% of all track locations, mostly in soil depths of 20 to 30 cm. 4. Monitoring soil density for 5 yr after the treatment indicated no natural rehabilitation (decrease) of soil density down to pretreatment levels.
36