Publication | Closed Access
Improving Lesion-Symptom Mapping
1.4K
Citations
42
References
2007
Year
Traumatic Brain InjuryNeuropsychologyDiagnosisBrain MappingInterventional RadiologySurgeryBrain LesionScalp Electrical PotentialsSocial SciencesBrain InjuryNeurologyImage-guided InterventionNeurorehabilitationCognitive NeuroscienceRadiologyLesion-symptom MappingNeuroimaging ModalityMedical ImagingNeuroimagingRehabilitationBrain DisruptionBrain ImagingNeuroscienceVoxel-based Lesion MappingMedicine
Brain activation studies are widely used to infer function, but disruption studies—examining behavior after injury—can identify regions essential for tasks. Voxel‑based lesion mapping links behavioral deficits to lesion locations and informs optimal neurosurgical targeting. We compared statistical tests on simulated data and on stroke patients with spatial perception deficits, and released freely available MRIcron software to implement them. The Liebermeister test outperforms chi‑square for binomial data, and the Brunner‑Munzel test better handles non‑binomial data, enhancing lesion‑mapping sensitivity.
Measures of brain activation (e.g., changes in scalp electrical potentials) have become the most popular method for inferring brain function. However, examining brain disruption (e.g., examining behavior after brain injury) can complement activation studies. Activation techniques identify regions involved with a task, whereas disruption techniques are able to discover which regions are crucial for a task. Voxel-based lesion mapping can be used to determine relationships between behavioral measures and the location of brain injury, revealing the function of brain regions. Lesion mapping can also correlate the effectiveness of neurosurgery with the location of brain resection, identifying optimal surgical targets. Traditionally, voxel-based lesion mapping has employed the chi-square test when the clinical measure is binomial and the Student's t test when measures are continuous. Here we suggest that the Liebermeister approach for binomial data is more sensitive than the chi-square test. We also suggest that a test described by Brunner and Munzel is more appropriate than the t test for nonbinomial data because clinical and neuropsychological data often violate the assumptions of the t test. We test our hypotheses comparing statistical tests using both simulated data and data obtained from a sample of stroke patients with disturbed spatial perception. We also developed software to implement these tests (MRIcron), made freely available to the scientific community.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1