Trials · 2014 · 213 citations · 8 references
MedicineHealth PolicyEvidence-based PracticeGood Clinical PracticeHealth Services ResearchClinical Trial Data CollectionClinical Trial DesignClinical Trial Protocol ReviewClinical TrialsDelphi StudiesStudy DesignClinical Evidence ReviewClinical Protocol DesignClinical Trial ReportingDelphi Technique VariantsDescriptive DataMethodological ReliabilityMethodological RigorTrial Methodology Assessment
BACKGROUND: Research into the methods used in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of clinical trials is essential to ensure that effective methods are available and that clinical decisions made using results from trials are based on the best available evidence, which is reliable and robust. METHODS: An on-line Delphi survey of 48 UK Clinical Research Collaboration registered Clinical Trials Units (CTUs) was undertaken. During round one, CTU Directors were asked to identify important topics that require methodological research. During round two, their opinion about the level of importance of each topic was recorded, and during round three, they were asked to review the group's average opinion and revise their previous opinion if appropriate. Direct reminders were sent to maximise the number of responses at each round. Results are summarised using descriptive methods. RESULTS: Forty one (85%) CTU Directors responded to at least one round of the Delphi process: 25 (52%) responded in round one, 32 (67%) responded in round two, 24 (50%) responded in round three. There were only 12 (25%) who responded to all three rounds and 18 (38%) who responded to both rounds two and three. Consensus was achieved amongst CTU Directors that the top three priorities for trials methodological research were 'Research into methods to boost recruitment in trials' (considered the highest priority), 'Methods to minimise attrition' and 'Choosing appropriate outcomes to measure'. Fifty other topics were included in the list of priorities and consensus was reached that two topics, 'Radiotherapy study designs' and 'Low carbon trials', were not priorities. CONCLUSIONS: This priority setting exercise has identified the research topics felt to be most important to the key stakeholder group of Directors of UKCRC registered CTUs. The use of robust methodology to identify these priorities will help ensure that this work informs the trials methodological research agenda, with a focus on topics that will have most impact and relevance.
8
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
Paula Williamson, Douglas G. Altman, Jane Blazeby et al. · Trials · 2012 · 1.7K citations · Full text
OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology
Peter Tugwell, Maarten Boers, Peter Brooks et al. · Trials · 2007 · 540 citations · Full text
Outcomes from the Patient Perspective Workshop at OMERACT 6.
John Kirwan, Turid Heiberg, Sarah Hewlett et al. · PubMed · 2003 · 216 citations · Full text
Jochen Schmitt, Sinéad Langan, Tanja Stamm et al. · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · 2010 · 178 citations · Full text