Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2010 · 230 citations · 24 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineOncologyDiagnostic RadiologyMolecular ImagingOncologic ImagingPositron Emission TomographySquamous Cell CarcinomaTumor CharacterizationTumor Imaging18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ImagingClinical Outcome MeasurementOncologic Pet ImagingPet-computed TomographyPositron Emission Tomography PrognosisTherapeutic Decision-makingTnm Staging SystemWhole-body Pet Imaging
PURPOSE To address the impact of positron emission tomography with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (PET-FDG) on the initial staging and management of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter, prospective study included 233 patients with newly diagnosed and untreated HNSCC. TNM stage and therapeutic decision were first determined based on the conventional work-up (including physical examination, computed tomography [CT]/magnetic resonance imaging of the head and neck region, and thoracic CT) and sealed in envelope 1. Whole-body PET-FDG was then performed, and subsequent TNM stage and therapeutic decision were written in envelope 2. Changes in TNM stages and in patient management as a result of PET-FDG imaging were recorded. Clinical outcome and histopathology were used as gold standards to validate the TNM stage. Conventional and PET stages were compared using the McNemar test. Results Conventional and PET stage were discordant in 100 (43%) of 233 patients. PET proved to be accurate in 47 patients and inaccurate in 13 patients. TNM status was left unconfirmed in 40 patients because no therapeutic change was expected from the stage difference. Conventional + PET TNM classification (envelope 2) was significantly more accurate than conventional classification (envelope 1; P < .0001, McNemar test). PET-FDG altered the therapeutic plan in 32 (13.7%) of 233 patients. CONCLUSION Adding whole-body PET-FDG to the pretherapeutic conventional staging of HNSCC improved the TNM classification of the disease and altered the management of 13.7% of patients. These findings support the implementation of PET-FDG in the routine imaging work-up of HNSCC.
24
Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Usefulness and Accuracy of PET/CT Image Fusion
Heiko Schöder, Henry Yeung, Mithat Gönen et al. · Radiology · 2004 · 393 citations
Head and Neck Malignancy: Is PET/CT More Accurate than PET or CT Alone?
Barton F. Branstetter, Todd M. Blodgett, Lee A. Zimmer et al. · Radiology · 2005 · 331 citations
PET-based treatment planning in radiotherapy: a new standard?
Vincent Grégoire, Karin Haustermans, Xavier Geets et al. · PubMed · 2007 · 196 citations