2012 · 23 citations · 10 references
Life SciencesAnimal SciencesGeneticsPopulation GeneticsQuantitative GeneticsStatistical GeneticsAnimal GeneticsGenetic EvaluationGenomic PredictionGenotype ImputationAccuracy Of Breeding Value PredictionGenomic Prediction AccuracyGenomic Prediction In Animal BreedingGenomic Prediction In LivestockMulti-trait AnalysisMulti-trait EvaluationMulti-trait InheritanceReference Population Comparison
Genomic predictions were compared on U.S. scale after combining 50,000 (50K) and 777,000 (HD) marker genotypes across countries. The genotyped Holsteins included 161,341 animals with five marker densities including 1,510 with HD. Imputation was more accurate with FImpute than with findhap across the five densities. Reliability of HD predictions minus reliability of 50K predictions averaged only 0.4%. For 50K predictions, reliability for the combined reference population was higher than for domestic only, with the gain averaging 2.6% for Holsteins and 3.2% for Brown Swiss when 50K genotypes were added for 3,593 foreign Holstein and 732 Brown Swiss bulls that had no U.S. daughters prior to August 2008. Gains should be larger with 7,974 foreign Holstein and 870 Brown Swiss bulls in the May 2012 reference population. Multi-trait methods were not more accurate than single-trait for Holsteins, but multi-trait reliability averaged 1.4% higher than single-trait for Brown Swiss, perhaps because of lower genetic correlations between Brown Swiss populations. International exchange improves accuracy and decreases cost of obtaining additional phenotypes and genotypes.
10
Genomic evaluations with many more genotypes
P.M. VanRaden, Jeffrey R. O’Connell, G.R. Wiggans et al. · Genetics Selection Evolution · 2011 · 276 citations · Full text
Genomic imputation and evaluation using high-density Holstein genotypes
P.M. VanRaden, D.J. Null, Mehdi Sargolzaei et al. · Journal of Dairy Science · 2012 · 213 citations · Full text