Publication | Open Access
A flexible protocol for the induction of recipient endometrial cycles in an oocyte donation programme
54
Citations
18
References
1996
Year
Hormonal ContraceptiveFertilityOocyte DonationReproductive HealthGynecologyFemale Reproductive SystemMenstrual CycleReproductive BiologyRecipient Endometrial CyclesEmbryologyPregnancy OutcomeOocyte Donation ProgrammePublic HealthInfertilityFlexible ProtocolMaternal HealthEndocrinologyOvarian HormoneFertility PreservationFertility TrackingHuman ReproductionUterine ReceptivityOestradiol AdministrationMedicineWomen's Health
Synchronization of the availability of good quality oocytes from donors and adequate endometrial maturation of recipients are very important for the success of an oocyte donation programme. A flexible protocol for the endometrial preparation of recipients is important in timing embryo transfer between days 17 and 19 of the cycle ('window of receptivity'). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the length of oestradiol administration to recipients on pregnancy outcome. Oestrogen administration was 8 mg/day, but its length varied prospectively from 6 to 27 days, followed by the addition of progesterone (100 mg daily i.m.) for 2-4 days according to the availability of good quality oocytes. Pregnancy outcome was evaluated regardless of age, indication for oocyte donation or number of embryos transferred per patient. The pregnancy rate per cycle was comparable when oestradiol was administered from 6 to 11 days before progesterone addition, while it dropped significantly thereafter. The variation in progesterone administration did not affect pregnancy outcome. These findings provide us with a greater flexibility by allowing us to vary oestradiol administration to recipients from 6 to 11 days prior to progesterone, reducing considerably, therefore, the need to cancel embryo transfer because of oocyte unavailability. Thus we can arrange to transfer embryos between days 17 and 19 of the recipient's cycle so as to obtain the best possible clinical outcome.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1