Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures

616

Citations

27

References

2003

Year

TLDR

Comfort and discomfort in sitting are debated concepts lacking a consensus definition, and while they are inherently subjective, objective methods such as posture analysis, pressure measurements, and EMG are used to assess them. The study presents a theoretical framework defining comfort and discomfort and indicating their hypothetical associations with underlying factors. The authors reviewed literature to examine relationships between objective measures and subjective comfort or discomfort ratings. Twenty‑one studies examined simultaneous objective and subjective measures, revealing that pressure distribution has the clearest association with comfort or discomfort, while other variables such as spinal profile or muscle activity show weaker, often non‑significant relationships.

Abstract

The concepts of comfort and discomfort in sitting are under debate. There is no widely accepted definition, although it is beyond dispute that comfort and discomfort are feelings or emotions that are subjective in nature. Yet, beside several subjective methodologies, several objective methods (e.g. posture analysis, pressure measurements, electromyography (EMG) are in use to assess sitting comfort or discomfort. In the current paper a theoretical framework is presented, in which comfort and discomfort were defined and the hypothetical associations with underlying factors were indicated. Next, the literature was reviewed to determine the relationships between objective measures and subjective ratings of comfort and discomfort. Twenty-one studies were found in which simultaneous measures of an objective parameter and a subjective rating of comfort or discomfort were obtained. Pressure distribution appears to be the objective measure with the most clear association with the subjective ratings. For other variables, regarding spinal profile or muscle activity for instance, the reported associations are less clear and usually not statistically significant.

References

YearCitations

Page 1