Publication | Closed Access
Development of a Scale to Measure Memorable Tourism Experiences
1.4K
Citations
79
References
2010
Year
Customer SatisfactionMemorable Tourism ExperienceTourism ManagementPerformance StudiesTourism SupplyDestination MarketingTourism MarketingMemorable Tourism ExperiencesTourism PerformanceHospitality MarketingUser ExperienceBusinessCultural TourismTourismReliable Measurement ScaleMarketingTourist Experience
The quality of experiences directly determines revenue, yet tourism literature lacks explanation of the factors that make experiences memorable. The study aims to develop a valid, reliable scale to measure memorable tourism experiences to aid understanding and management. Using Churchill’s 1979 process, the authors created a 24‑item scale covering seven domains—hedonism, refreshment, local culture, meaningfulness, knowledge, involvement, and novelty—applicable to most destinations. The scale’s dimensional structure, internal consistency, and content, construct, convergent, and discriminant validity were supported by the data, with implications discussed.
The quality experiences provided to customers, which are indeed memorable, directly determine a business’s ability to generate revenue (Pine and Gilmore 1999). However, the extant tourism literature has provided limited explanation of the factors that characterize memorable tourism experiences. Thus, the goal of the present study was to develop a valid and reliable measurement scale that will assist in understanding the concept and in improving the effective management of the memorable experience. Following Churchill’s (1979) recommended process, we developed a 24-item memorable tourism experience scale that we believe is applicable to most destination areas. The scale comprises seven domains: hedonism, refreshment, local culture, meaningfulness, knowledge, involvement, and novelty. The data support this dimensional structure of the memorable tourism experience as well as its internal consistency and validity (i.e., content, construct, convergent, and discriminant validity). Theoretical and managerial implications of the study results are discussed in detail.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1